| ANOTHER
LINK IN THE CHAIN by Rob Poyton
Martial
arts consist of core components or principles. For example
a good boxer works to integrate the components of footwork,
speed, fitness, technique and “spirit” and
will train in several ways in order to do this. Oriental
martial arts have traditionally used forms or kata as
a means to preserve core training principles, alongside
practices such as set drills, application work, sparring
and so on.
As
we know Systema has no set routines or catalogue of
techniques and so relies on a different approach to
training. It is easy to misinterpret these methods when
seeing them for the first time or without any supporting
explanation - quite understandable when people are used
to seeing things presented in a certain way. For example,
if we see a picture of someone in a kata posture, no-one
is under any doubt that that is not a representation
of a “real” situation. Likewise, if we see
two people gloved up and sparring, it is clear that
this is a method of training technique in a “live”
environment. It is obvious that someone skipping is
working cardio. What is not always clear is when we
see people working in what might look like sparring
or application / technique, but in fact is an exercise
with a different purpose.
Recently
I was watching Vladimir’s excellent new Hand to
Hand dvd which features a bonus section on working with
and against the chain. It is clear that flexible weapons
require a greater level of skill both to defend against
and to use and it is also clear that the chain is a
great tool for developing good movement. The idea of
the chain got me thinking about links and the old adage
that a chain is only as strong as the weakest link.
In the meantime I was scheduled to teach a short session
at the 2005 Martial Arts Planet Meet (a great day by
the way), where I would be attempting to give people
who had never seen it before a taste of the System.
The
chain analogy stuck in my mind and I came up with the
idea of our separate drills being “links in the
chain”. I thought this may be a useful analogy
in order to help newcomers understand our process of
training.
At
the MAP Meet I ran through some basic knife work, so
I will use that here as my subject - though the principle
can apply to any / all areas of training. Please also
note I'm only covering the idea of progression here,
this is not an article on knife defence. One other thing
I should mention - when I use the word "drill"
I'm referring to an exercise where one or more people
initiates a random attacking move on another. I mention
this in as the word "drill" for some means
practicing a set attack / defence routine, which is
not the case in Systema.
So,
back to our chain, as it relates to close in knife work.
The foundation work is to see how the body reacts to
the touch of the knife. Starting with contact is important
- psychologically we are getting used to the feel and
proximity of a metal blade; we are training the body
movement that is the base of all the knife defence work;
the body movement also acts as damage limitation (in
the event of the knife not being seen, only felt, we
hope that through encouraging the body to move in the
right way we can minimise the effect of the stab or
slash).
The
first link in the chain is simply to have the partner
push the knife into the body and allow the body move
accordingly. There can already be problems at this stage
- some people do not want to let the blade touch them.
This can be, perhaps, because they do not understand
the basis of the drill and see it instead as some form
of sparring, where to let the knife touch you is to
“lose”. That is exactly what the drill is
not about - it is purely to understand your physical
and emotional/psychological reaction to the contact.
Not letting the knife touch you invalidates the exercise.
One
person said to me “in real life I’ll never
let a knife get that close to me”. It’s
an interesting idea and of course no-one wants
to let a knife get near them in real life. Problem is
in real life many times you will not even see
the knife - particularly if you are in a crowd. Which
makes it even more important to study your reactions
to contact with the blade.
The
second link in the chain is to see how good your initial
movement is. Your partner now follows up their first
stab with a second. This is to check that your first
movement doesn’t put you in a worse position (for
example bending forward or back, or putting yourself
off balance)
Link
number three is to work against the flat of the blade
as well. The knife wielder now not only stabs but also
slashes (keeping the body contact). The work now is
to try and keep the flat of the blade against the body
rather than the point of the edge. This calls for a
considerable degree of sensitivity and free movement
in the body.
From
here, the next link is to explore working against the
blade itself, either with the body or with the hand.
The aim is to explore methods of controlling or re-directing
the blade from direct contact.
Now
we can turn our attention to the knife wielder. Link
five is to work on controlling the knife hand / arm.
Work on pinning it to the body, controlling the elbow
and so on. Add the direct blade work from the last step
into this and you are now beginning work on disarms
or returns.
The
next link - once the knife arm is controlled - is to
work against the rest of the person .This can take the
form of strikes, takedowns, verbal commands, use of
clothing, improvised weapons and so on. Each area is
worthy of study in its own right.
So
far we have worked largely physical factors. For the
next few links we need to consider all the other elements
that make up a “situation”. Some of these
might be:
ENVIROMENTAL
- are you outdoors, indoors, sitting down, on the floor?
Is it dark? What sort of floor surface are you on?
SITUATIONAL
- is this a robbery, an attempt on your life, are you
in a crowd, is your family with you, is there more than
one attacker?
EMOTIONAL
/ PSYCHOLGICAL - is either party under the influence
of alcohol or drugs, what has lead up to this stage,
should you be aggressive or passive?
These
are just some examples, I’m sure you can think
of many more. Each of these things can be seen as another
link in the chain. Once you have a feel for the basics
you can start adding more of these links in. Do the
same work from a sitting position. Work against two
or three people. Work in different environments and
under different types of pressure.
You
have to understand, though, that whatever type of work
you are doing, it will come to nothing without an understanding
of the core Systema principles. Likewise training those
principles always in the same way and in a comfort zone
(not that I have seen that done in any class) will not
prepare you for reality.
As
I mentioned already, this is different from a technique
based approach many people are used to so I can understand
where confusion arises. I want to mention again that
this is only an illustration of one aspect of Systema
training and should only be taken as such. But it will
hopefully go some way towards explaining clips where
the defender doesn't use his arms for example - it doesn't
mean that we advocate never using your arms for knife
defence, it is just one link in the training chain.
Anytime
you are working and things are not going well, drop
back a couple of links down the chain and work on the
problem area slowly. Then you can shift back up again.
Failure to address fundamental problems due to the allure
of doing “full speed full resistance training”
will mean considerable slowness in progression and skill
acquisition. I’ve seen this on a number of occasions
when techniques are practiced in a repetitive, rote
manner, then as soon as the pressure rises the techniques
disappear or fail to work in the prescribed way. Why?
Because there is no recognition of the core principles
that make the technique effective. It's like trying
learning how to do a card trick without even knowing
how to shuffle the deck. Don't look for "tricks"
that will address only one particular set of circumstances
but work to understand the underlying principles of
movement, psychology and technical work.
Remember
- a chain as a weapon can be as dangerous to the wielder
as to the defender. And in a wider sense we are all
just links in a chain......
|